🔗 Share this article

I possess some opinions regarding the comments delivered by ESPN commentator a well-known announcer after Novak Djokovic's victory over Taylor Fritz during the US Open quarter-finals. Consider – Fritz is American, the commentator is American – and athletic competitions frequently lend themselves to patriotic sentiment. Some disappointment was appropriate. Instead, he invoked the continued drought of US male players at the majors: none of them has won a title since Andy Roddick in 2003, and Fritz had been the final representative in the tournament.

Everyone enjoy a narrative, myself included. But really. Suppose the American had beaten Djokovic for the initial occasion, phenomenal talent the Spanish star was waiting in the following match, who Fritz has never defeated in an competitive encounter. And if he’d somehow gotten past that, it would have been defending champion the Italian, versus him Fritz had dropped 10 of the last 11 sets. Alcaraz and Sinner had also divided the last seven major titles (and Alcaraz went on to defeat a fatigued Serbian in the next round). He said in post-match interviews after the loss that he in fact liked his path, because it presented the chance to defeat the three best players in the sport back-to-back. He is well within his right to aspire to the achievement; an athlete is supposed to believe in themselves. But entering that Djokovic last eight match what other person in their right mind had the drought of US winners in mind?

Coco Gauff’s weaker delivery the sole barrier between her and consistent victories

The American, 28, is ranked number four in the world entering the upcoming year-end championships and has won his previous six matches over No 3 the German with increasing ease. Presumably he might take that spot for himself in the coming years. But it’s clear that right now, that is as high as he can rise: The Italian and Spaniard sit a chasm of performance metrics away. His top-class serve and concussive strength on each forehand and reverse side are more than adequate to dispose of most rivals on the ATP tour. When facing the select few once-in-a-lifetime players, though, Fritz is frequently helpless. The last several seasons has witnessed the curious rise of lanky, towering players who can nonetheless cover the court with the surprising speed and grace of smaller men. He is six-foot-five and looks it. His movement is stiff, as if he hasn't fully adapted to his legs. So he seldom win a rally that the other player was controlling, and playing a soft shot against him is usually a safe bet. That acts as a quite severe limitation on his upside.

Fritz has achieved a several dramatic, unexpected advancements over the years. Early on of the decade, he was hovering around the lower end of the world's best thirty. Two years after, he was approaching the top 10. The previous season, he suddenly surged up to fourth place – and held the position. But the subsequent step, competing against and defeating legendary figures like the young Spaniard, the Italian, and even a declining Djokovic, is the toughest of all. What was Fowler have been thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a legitimate contender to beat them all back-to-back? That it was worth commenting on the continuing slump of American men winning major titles when Fritz had exited the US Open in the quarter-finals? The desperation is just too much and the respect for the difficulty of the task too little.

The American star achieved a personal best run to the Wimbledon last four in July.

The American's performance in that very quarter-final should have been sufficient of an sign. The Serbian won in four sets, a victory that only seemed uncertain for moments towards the conclusion, when the American had survived a few match points and had a chance to maintain serve for 5-5. The pair appeared well-balanced during the exchanges, with the American earning plenty of chances to win the opponent's serve. But the champion saved break point after service break opportunity, prolonging the run to the brink of agony. When he eventually did convert one of the opportunities at 5-5 in the second set, he immediately produced a horrendous service game to drop serve again; Djokovic had drawn him into a skirmish peripheral to the real battle and compelled him to expend far too much effort to prevail. Facing set points in the last game, Fritz’s primary delivery floated to heaven. He extended the match two times on his backup delivery, but finally double-faulted. It wasn’t a collapse, in my opinion, just a result of having to hit too many weaker deliveries.

The contest was quite compelling proof that the American is not good enough to beat any form of the Serbian, that lost to the Spaniard in the following match and never especially appeared like he believed he could win. This is perfectly fine – the Serbian is the best player ever, and might not be at the height of his physical powers now, but has developed sufficient knowledge and strategic intelligence to make up for a significant portion of the drop-off. The problem is those who were expecting Fritz to win, and putting pressure on him to achieve that, when he was yet to accomplished anything that suggested he could.

The American is an valuable contributor to the circuit regardless. He’s a calm, reflective voice in media sessions, more so than almost everyone on the men's tour aside from the Russian star, willing to not just express how he feels or the strategy he believed decided a match, but explain it. That he ought to bear the brunt of the responsibility for America failing to produce a men's grand slam winner since the last American titlist seems unjust. (Since the fellow American is competing alongside him in the standings, perhaps they can share that load.)

Year-End Championships: Player Divisions

American legend Group

• The Spanish phenom
• Taylor Fritz (US)
• Alex de Minaur (Aus)
• Lorenzo Musetti (It)

Swedish icon Division

• The Italian champion
• The German powerhouse
• The rising American
• The Canadian talent

“I’d probably dwell on it indefinitely if I fail to accomplish it,” the American informed a journalist in June of winning a major. It is hoped he understands that he’s not unsuccessful if he doesn’t fulfill that objective, that breaking through Alcaraz and Sinner’s young, terrifying empire is actually highly improbable for all other players. {