🔗 Share this article

Iran is willing to resume nuclear discussions with the United States on condition that it is approached with "respect" and "respect", Iran's top diplomat has announced.

Abbas Araghchi said solely negotiations worked, and disclosed fresh requests had come from go-betweens to resume discussions with the US government. He claimed Iran had zero undeclared nuclear sites, and Iran could not yet allow the global atomic watchdog to access bombed nuclear sites for protective measures.

Navigating a Difficult Course

Araghchi is walking a difficult route since Iran does not want appear to be acting from a position of weakness, and he emphatically stated that Iran had arisen more powerful defensively and mentally from the joint assault on its atomic facilities in June.

He was speaking at a security conference in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "an inalienable right to enrich uranium on home soil that it will always maintain" – the key factor of the deadlock in the previous talks.

Earlier Negotiations Unexpectedly Ended

The previous five rounds of talks between the US and Iran were brought to an abrupt and hostile end on 12 June when Israel, with US support, targeted Iran's enrichment centers in a 12-day war that concluded with the American leader claiming the sites had been destroyed. Following this, EU nations exercised their privilege to restore UN-wide sanctions, but Iran insists they have not had a significant effect.

Magic Solution Offered

Tehran representatives stated they felt they had reached a "ideal resolution" to the enrichment issue in previous talks, when it was settled an Iran-based consortium with American involvement could enrich uranium. Both sides would have been able to declare success since home-based processing would have persisted and the US could be certain that Iran's nuclear programme was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been settled in the discussions that US nuclear scientists could operate on Iranian soil, but that was a natural consequence of the partnership suggestion. Representatives claimed on multiple occasions they had secured an understanding with the US representative the US official only for the agreement to collapse due to "spoilers in Washington".

Current Situation

Tehran representatives said the cooperative arrangement was now no longer available, but it seems highly likely the proposal could be resurrected in various formats if discussions reopen.

Trump in recent days stated he had been obtaining communications that Iran wanted to restart talks, but privately Iranian officials state they are not yet receiving consistent overtures from America either directly or from key regional mediators, such as the Qatari government, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been accused of non-responsiveness in the wake of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Tehran states negotiations is not part of a show.

Political Standpoint

In his remarks to the forum, aimed to depict the US as a hegemonic power that exploits the notion of worldwide standards, Araghchi said the fortnight-long engagement showed the conflict could not be settled by armed force. He said the attacks started with a American requirement for an unconditional Iranian surrender and ended with an unconditional call for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is assured the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were mounted with total Washington understanding and cooperation, making trust hard to reestablish.

Diplomacy Stays the Final Solution

Araghchi stated: "Tehran was not the one that had deserted dialogue; it was the United States and the western countries that had repeatedly attempted to dictate their desires during the talks. Dialogue can still be active and remains the ultimate answer to address disagreements, but its criteria, guidelines and tenets must be respected."

"Provided that they talk to the Iranian people with the approach of dignity and honor, they will get a reply in the same language."

Restoration and Rebuilding

In what is characterized by Iranian officials as the conflict of recovery and rebuilding, Araghchi said he was certain Iran's security strengths "have significantly improved than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been restored. We acquired many lessons from this conflict; we have come to know our personal limitations and the vulnerabilities of the opponent."

He added: "We successfully passed this conflict. Our enrichment knowledge, which they intended to eliminate, continues to exist. The facilities and machinery, if destroyed, will be restored; what is crucial is the will of the nation of Iran and then the national cohesion that they aimed at, but failed to shatter. The Iranian people have become more powerful, more united, and more backing of the government and the state in the face of this assault."