🔗 Share this article

Transpired Ruben Amorim was able to withstand a loss to Grimsby. He weathered losing a crucial continental showpiece versus one of the worst Spurs sides in living memory. He could survive losing at home against West Ham and Wolves, a lowly league position, his rigid approach, squandering some of the club’s best academy products, a poor winning percentage, labeling his team the worst the club has ever seen. Yet, there existed one adversary with whom Ruben Amorim would not be allowed to tango. You come at Jason Wilcox, and you best not miss.

Unfortunately, similar to numerous Premiership right-back during Blackburn Rovers' championship campaign, the coach took on Jason Wilcox and seems to have failed. Even the most distracted of readers will notice the paradoxical situation: a coach who often railed his squad for failing in one-on-one duels succumbing when confronted by the white heat and animal charisma of one of the Premier League’s most intimidating football executives.

In truth, this whole bruising episode seems to paint the director in a whole new light. It may have been tempting, based on his brief stint in a similar role with the Saints, to regard him as little more than a drudge within the club's structure: a man who owed his position largely to his close relationship with ex-colleague a fellow executive rather than any verifiable talent. How wrong we all were. By masterfully outmanoeuvring United’s feted head coach, just as he bested the unfortunate Dan Ashworth before him, Jason Wilcox has demonstrated as one of the sport’s true generals: a tactical intellect that the club's competitors are now justifiably concerned.

A Strategic Clash Regarding Formation & Ideology

For example, this was Jason Wilcox , after having been part of the hierarchy that hired the rigid 3-4-3 advocate Amorim originally, played a key role in attempting to convince Amorim to ditch his beloved 3-4-3. Naturally, these pleas were resisted. But perhaps such directives hold greater authority when delivered by a man with the impeccable football pedigree he possesses, a veteran of three England caps and a contributor to a title-winning side from 31 years ago.

Perhaps in time Jason Wilcox might agree to explain his thought processes to the rest of us. Maybe one day questions may arise why Amorim is departing with a full payout, without any compensation reduction clause in place. The director speaks rarely in public, and with very good reason. The true intellectuals of this sport – men like Jason Wilcox – simply operate on a plane exceeding our mundane comprehension. If he ever did speak, probably all we would hear would be ultrasonic blips and complex calculations. Wanting is not quite the same as being ready to receive.

The Supreme Authority In the Throne

Naturally, by focusing our attention on Jason Wilcox we are obscuring the real power behind the club's current leadership. The director is, in reality, merely executing the commands of his superior Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who privately has emphasized his desire for a four-man defense. It is reported, the owner has also proposed playing Bryan Mbeumo in a wing-back role. The owner is eager for United to embrace analytics and analytics. Per reports, in an executive meeting early in his minority ownership, he announced that United’s style to football “shall be decided in this room”.

Ultimately, Sir Jim is a specialist in this technical football matters, leveraging his previous experience in petrochemicals and sailing. Above all he remains immensely wealthy, and as we all know, the wealthy are superior: more perceptive, more wise, more tactically astute, fundamentally superior. Who else would you trust to oversee a strategic plan of cost-cutting, the building of a modern arena that looks a lot like someone’s leftover knitting, the acquisition of a new striker?

The New Football Hierarchy: Executives Above Coaches

This represents a shift that is becoming prevalent at the elite levels of the game. Historically, clubs foolishly entrusted major sporting choices to low-level employees such as coaches, talent spotters – even footballers. Perhaps it was once possible for an up-and-coming, visionary coach with ideas and drive to join an organization and see their vision through to completion. But how many companies have these guys established? What number of large-scale layoffs have they overseen? Far preferable to invest the real power where it belongs: the executive class, the casually dressed executives, the guys with impressive professional resumes. It is wiser to decide the strategy in the boardroom and hire a coach who can tailor their methods accordingly. If coaches were once chefs, they are now more like Deliveroo drivers: not responsible for the food, yet ultimately answerable should it be delivered poorly or leaks out to meet standards.

Nowadays, a coach's role is increasingly not about defining the vision and more about marketing it: the front-facing representative on the front desk, the public face for a club they have minimal power to change. A coach at Chelsea leads a team of literal children into the Champions League and wins domestic cups, and essentially is dismissed for talking. A manager at Celtic finds his reputation ruined while the people who appointed him live to blunder indefinitely.

A Modern Corporate Football: Accountability Only for the Coaches

And possibly in a small way this is simply corporate governance at work: the rise of a privileged overclass who can never be wrong, whose choices are always untouchable, whose mistakes can always be resolved by sacking without explanation. Hire the system coach and then fire them for using excessively 3-4-3. Hire the project manager and then bin him for requiring too long. And above all be grateful; for the incremental season ticket price rises, for your new player acquisitions, for the reality that the adults – however well qualified – remain in control.